Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-24583896-20160615201315

Though we attempted to take care of this issue months ago, it is still a huge concern here. Many users on the wiki are still not treated fairly, and the rules don't reflect reasonable behavior on their behalf. Truthfully, the only thing that has legitimately changed about he rules page is the design! The rules themselves are still very strict and unreasonable. So unreasonable, in fact, they are not enforced correctly nor have they been followed in a way that is fair.

After seeing a few users here express their complaints, I decided to speak with one of them about ways in which we could improve. That user being Deadlydark. He mentioned quite a few issues that obstruct the wiki, but why do you think that is? The rules are not being followed. If we want this wiki to improve, on way to achieve that is by fixing the policies we set forth. Deadly and I thought of a few suggestions: There are just a few suggestions of ours, but any of you are free to give insight. The rules are still in need of improvement, so how can it be achieved? 
 * We agreed that it would only be fair if, say, someone makes a block claim against another user. If evidence is found, we give a warning to the user the claim was made against. On the other hand, if we don't find evidence, then we give a warning to the person who mad the claim against the user.
 * We need to bias to decline
 * Also, we agreed that promotions and elections should be held differently as well. The both of us thought it would make more since if users could still apply for a position without hosting an election at all. But, if there are too many rollbacks, chatmods, admins, you name it, then an election could be held to select a "president" or respective world leader for that particular staff position