Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-4923516-20151219233412/@comment-24583896-20151220065211

Krazy, I respect your opinion, but with all due respect, there is a slight sense of corruption in your approach. What I'm getting here is that you want to be in control of the way others present their ideas. I can see why in terms of graphic maturity. However, the flaws that often appear or "how much English they know" is far beyond our control. Quite honestly, that factor in itself could offend people.

If a newcomer is trying to accommodate themselves here, we don't want to have too many limitations. If we're trying to welcome new members, the last thing we need to do is promote an exclusive set of ideals. They might not be fit for everyone and it's almost dismal knowing admins, the authority, expect them to be. I don't see the corrections we admins make as babysitting, we're just doing our job. Even so, we should also instill a tolerant and compassionate scene for those new here. It shouldn't seem as if their ideas disturb us

All of these expectations have been set, but let's not forget, this is a fandom. The way fans chose to exaggerate their ideas doesn't always have to lead off into what's immortalized. If it's not licensed, I don't think it's supposed to be "what it is". At least, not on behalf of everyone. Say an idea does contradict a show it's inspired by. I seriously doubt it's a direct violation unless the person responsible claimed the title as their own. Thankfully, that's not the community were built here. Far from it. Plus, we could use a few distinct ideas here and there. It shows we're a community of visionaries.